The Supreme Court’s ruling, allowing the government to use eminent domain to take a private person’s property and award it to a private business, was just the wakeup call the legislature needed. The alarming thing is the government did not need a Supreme Court ruling to give them this authority: it is already in the State Code.
Eminent domain is a pressing problem of deceptive proportions for West Virginians. It is invoked over 140 times for a wide range of governmental officials, many of them holding small offices. Some of these positions are won by local votes that have a meager turnout. In some instances the winner garners a mere 40 votes.
Eminent domain has its place in society. If a homeowner’s property is the best spot for a school or for a road, then all of us can understand; but invoking eminent domain to wrest someone’s property for another private individual’s use is quite another matter.
West Virginia desperately needs a constitutional amendment that would give certain officials the right to use eminent domain and restrict eminent domain to public use.
Another problem with eminent domain is that if you take the government to court over your land, you still have to pay your lawyer’s fees even if you win. Homeowners pay significant amounts just to defend what is inherently theirs.
So far, the Democratic leadership, including Governor Joe Manchin, has ignored this issue; but I heard yesterday from a very reliable source that the Governor would put eminent domain on the call for the September special session.
It will be interesting to see the Democrat’s solution. They will most likely introduce a statutorily fix for the private issue only. The Republican Senator’s plan, led by Senator Yoder, will comprehensively repair eminent domain for good.
- Add your comments (3 so far)
© Copyright 1999-2007 William Stewart. All rights reserved.
Comments
Your comments here, show you don’t know jack squat about emminent domain.
Then again, neither does Sprouse, so I guess we shouldn’t be surprised.
I love how you mention the government can “take” someone’s private property, however, you conveniently leave out that they have to pay you for it. [CENSORED], you can even have a whole jury trial of your peers on what the property is worth, before they can “take” it from you.
I guess partisan and political rhetoric, takes precedence over substance when you are chief bootlicker for Sprouse, huh…
Batman, I assumed remuneration as stated in the 5th amendment to the U.S. Constitution was common knowledge. Thanks for clarifying that point.
[…] Ignoring the fact that Governor Manchin refused to put the issue of eminent domain on September special session’s call and that any resolution introduced by Republicans on the issue were summarily voted down my Democrats, the Monongalia County Democratic Executive Committee published an full-color ad in the Monongalia Times, misrepresenting the Democrat’s true record. […]